Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:11:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:11:41 -0500 Received: from modemcable191.130-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.130.191]:39172 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:11:40 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:09:39 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Alan Cox cc: Mikael Pettersson , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5] notsc option needs some attention/TLC In-Reply-To: <1036847149.20313.2.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 864 Lines: 24 On 9 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 12:00, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > If we configure for "I have a TSC, period" you add the option > > to disable it, which nullifies any benefit of the config option > > in the first place since we can't assume TSC presence any more. > > If we don't configure for TSC, you force tsc_disable, which means > > that a generic kernel _can't_ use the TSC. > > 2.4 was modified to printk a message that TSC was not disabled. This > does confuse people This is all very confusing, notsc isnn't supposed to work with cpus with TSCs? Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/