Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:39:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:39:42 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:26015 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:39:41 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5] notsc option needs some attention/TLC From: Alan Cox To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: Mikael Pettersson , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 09 Nov 2002 19:10:13 +0000 Message-Id: <1036869013.20393.19.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 691 Lines: 22 On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 18:09, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > 2.4 was modified to printk a message that TSC was not disabled. This > > does confuse people > > This is all very confusing, notsc isnn't supposed to work with cpus with > TSCs? User boots TSC only kernel User gets problem User reads docs and says "notsc" User still has problem User confused. In the TSC only case printing a message that the TSC disable was not possible is IMHO good - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/