Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:26:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:26:25 -0500 Received: from sfo-gw.covalent.net ([207.44.198.62]:53574 "EHLO hand.dotat.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:26:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 23:24:49 +0000 From: Tony Finch To: Dan Kegel Cc: Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Tony Finch Subject: Re: TCP_NOPUSH on FreeBSD, TCP_CORK on Linux (was: Is sendfile all that sexy?) Message-ID: <20010205232449.H70673@hand.dotat.at> In-Reply-To: <3A66729E.3E9E3C64@alumni.caltech.edu> <20010202013104.A48377@hand.dotat.at> <20010205225411.E70673@hand.dotat.at> <3A7F3420.A3B10510@alumni.caltech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A7F3420.A3B10510@alumni.caltech.edu> Organization: Covalent Technologies, Inc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dan Kegel wrote: > >How close is TCP_NOPUSH to behaving identically to TCP_CORK now? They are exactly the same. >If it does behave identically, it might be time to standardize >the symbolic name for this option, to make apps more portable >between the two OS's. (It'd be nice to also standardize the >numeric value, in the interest of making the ABI's more compatible, too.) I wonder if it's a bit late for that now... This reminds me to make sure that FreeBSD's Linux emulation supports TCP_CORK properly. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch fanf@covalent.net dot@dotat.at " ``Well, let's go down and find out who's grave it is.'' ``How?'' ``By going down and finding out!'' " - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/