Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933646AbaDIN5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:57:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39245 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932786AbaDIN5g (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:57:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:57:06 -0400 From: Don Zickus To: Namhyung Kim Cc: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, LKML , jolsa@redhat.com, jmario@redhat.com, fowles@inreach.com, eranian@google.com, andi.kleen@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf, sort: Allow unique sorting instead of combining hist_entries Message-ID: <20140409135706.GD8488@redhat.com> References: <1395689676-214799-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1395689676-214799-7-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <87ha63t6gb.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ha63t6gb.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:31:00PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:34:36 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > > The cache contention tools needs to keep all the perf records unique in order > > to properly parse all the data. Currently add_hist_entry() will combine > > the duplicate record and add the weight/period to the existing record. > > > > This throws away the unique data the cache contention tool needs (mainly > > the data source). Create a flag to force the records to stay unique. > > No. This is why I said you need to add 'mem' and 'snoop' sort keys into > the c2c tool. This is not how sort works IMHO - if you need to make > samples unique let the sort key(s) distinguish them somehow, or you can > combine same samples (in terms of sort kes) and use the combined entry's > stat.nr_events and stat.period or weight. Ok. I understand your point. Perhaps this was my lack of fully understanding the sorting algorithm when I did this. I can look into adding the 'mem' and 'snoop'. One concern I do have is we were caculating statistics based on the weight (mean, median, stddev). I was afraid that combining the entries would throw off our calculations as we could no longer accurately determine them any more. Is that true? Cheers, Don -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/