Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:07:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:07:08 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:38066 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:07:07 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 09:11:30 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jens Axboe , lkml , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.5.46-mm2 Message-ID: <20021110171130.GJ23425@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , lkml , linux-mm@kvack.org References: <3DCDD9AC.C3FB30D9@digeo.com> <20021110143208.GJ31134@suse.de> <20021110145203.GH23425@holomorphy.com> <20021110145757.GK31134@suse.de> <20021110150626.GI23425@holomorphy.com> <3DCE9034.6F833C31@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DCE9034.6F833C31@digeo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1525 Lines: 40 William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Go for it, I'm just trying to get tiobench to actually run (seems to >> have new/different "die from too many threads" behavior wrt. --threads). >> Dropping me a fresh kernel shouldn't slow anything down. On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 08:58:28AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > It could be the procps thing? `tiobench --threads 256' shows up as a > single process in top and ps due to the new thread consolidation feature. > If you run `ps auxm' or hit 'H' in top, all is revealed. Not my fave > feature that. Turns out monitoring things via /proc/ slowed it down by some ridiculous factor while it was trying to spawn threads. 9 hours became less than 1s when I stopped looking. On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 08:58:28AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > BLKELVGET/SET was removed Okay, looks like there's an fs to use to get at it with. On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 08:58:28AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> P.P.S: kgdb broke wchan reporting... investigating On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 08:58:28AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > ? The wchan reporting needs to get taught about kern_schedule() and user_schedule() so it can trim them off the stack, which consists of moving them between scheduling_functions_start_here() and scheduling_functions_end_here(). Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/