Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:30:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:30:55 -0500 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:18180 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:30:54 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:30:12 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Linus Torvalds , vojtech@ucw.cz Cc: Alan Cox , "J.E.J. Bottomley" , john stultz , lkml Subject: Re: Voyager subarchitecture for 2.5.46 Message-ID: <20021110163012.GB1564@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1036599549.9803.49.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1068 Lines: 23 Hi! > - when the next gettimeofday happens, we can check the sequence number > and the old gettimeofday, and verify that we get monotonic behaviour in > the absense of explicit date setting. This allows us to handle small > problems gracefully ("return the old time + 1 ns" to make it > monotonic even when we screw up), _and_ it will also act as a big clue > for us that we should try to synchronize - so that we basically never > need to worry about "should I check the clocks" (where "basically > never" may be "we check the clocks every minute or so if nothing else > happens") Unfortunately, this means "bye bye vsyscalls for gettimeofday". Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/