Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759190AbaDJW5U (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:57:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:62660 "EHLO mail-ie0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753715AbaDJW5S (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:57:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1395256011-2423-1-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com> <20140320153250.GC20618@thunk.org> <20140320163806.GA10440@thunk.org> <5346ED93.9040500@amacapital.net> <20140410203246.GB31614@thunk.org> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:57:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] File Sealing & memfd_create() From: David Herrmann To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-kernel , Kay Sievers , Daniel Mack , Lennart Poettering , John Stultz , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , linux-fsdevel , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ryan Lortie , "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Would it make sense for the initial mode on a memfd inode to be 000? > Anyone who finds this to be problematic could use fchmod to fix it. memfd_create() should be subject to umask() just like anything else. That should solve any possible race here, right? Thanks David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/