Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:44:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:44:09 -0500 Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.81]:46990 "EHLO mailout03.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:44:08 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 23:50:43 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6? Message-ID: <20021110225043.GB9197@lina.inka.de> References: <1036328263.29642.23.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20021109201121.GA136@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021109201121.GA136@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Bernd Eckenfels Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 621 Lines: 15 On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 09:11:21PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > I do not think having md5 sum of /bin/ls helps so much -- what if I > moify ld.so, instead? the checksum is intended to mimic the exisiting priveledge revocatin on altering. You could of course all all depenendn modules as checksums too, but this would be more our current suid system supports. Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/