Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754822AbaDKWFV (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:05:21 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:50989 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751146AbaDKWFT (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:05:19 -0400 Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 00:05:17 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Christian Grothoff Cc: Alejandra Morales , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Cryogenic: Enabling Power-Aware Applications on Linux Message-ID: <20140411220517.GA1203@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <9E3F9C2076C45D4783F09B90D5BE77CE1AEF7A@BADWLRZ-SWMBX13.ads.mwn.de> <20140411101926.GA27234@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <534838E8.10005@grothoff.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <534838E8.10005@grothoff.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > >> Cryogenic is the result of my Master's Thesis, completed at the Technical University > >> of Munich under the supervision of Christian Grothoff. You can find more information > >> about Cryogenic at https://gnunet.org/cryogenic > > > > Do you have any measurements how much power it actually saves? > > Yes, it depends on the device, but we have demonstrated power > savings for two different types of devices using two different > measurement setups performed by two independent groups. Some > of the measurements are available on the website, the second > set should become available "soon" (but we can already say that > for the scenario we measured, the savings are in the same range > as before). The video I seen.... AFAICT the savings are in <10% range? > > "I'd like to download my mails from IMAP server in next 30 > > minutes. But... it would be better done when I'm on 3G network with > > good signal (0.01W transmit power used for 3 seconds) than on GPRS > > with poor signal (2W transmit power for 4 minutes)..." > > Well, that's not quite what the API would allow, especially as it > is obviously hard to predict that a different network will become > available. Actually... its a phone so it probably has GPS :-). But I'd guess that even simpler logic, "if UMTS was available in last hour, it is likely to be available within hour" would work ok. I seen demo on UDP packets... delayed TCP socket write is probably easy, but would API allow delayed TCP connect? Hmm, but the API needs redoing, anyway, fcntl()? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/