Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754397AbaDNULb (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:11:31 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:47696 "EHLO mail-qc0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751519AbaDNUL3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:11:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [46.139.80.5] In-Reply-To: References: <1397211951-20549-1-git-send-email-miklos@szeredi.hu> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 22:11:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] wire up renameat2 syscall for various archs From: Miklos Szeredi To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Miklos, > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> This series wires up the recently added renameat2 syscall for archs that are >> up-to-date in the sense that they appear to support the latest syscalls. I >> haven't touched the rest of them.. >> >> Plus three NR_syscalls miscalculation fixes. > > Do you plan to collect acks, and ask Linus to pull this series later, or > do you want each arch maintainer to take the patches for his/her pet > architecture? Whichever works best for you. > > Note that I don't plan to send another pull request for 3.15 for m68k, > unless Something Really Bad happens. So, if that's okay, I'll send it off to Linus sometime later. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/