Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753486AbaDOIvf (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 04:51:35 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:52612 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751019AbaDOIvb (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 04:51:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:51:26 +0200 From: Torsten Duwe To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , "Theodore Ts'o" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Matt Mackall , Herbert Xu , Arnd Bergmann , Rusty Russell , Satoru Takeuchi , ingo.tuchscherer@de.ibm.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Hans-Georg Markgraf , Gerald Schaefer , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/03]: hwrng: khwrngd derating per device Message-ID: <20140415085126.GA17327@lst.de> References: <20140321142950.GI1763@lst.de> <20140321143342.GK1763@lst.de> <533375C1.5060904@mit.edu> <158d2776-1ea4-4f32-a9e9-0488047e6b70@email.android.com> <20140414160211.GE711@lst.de> <20140414160653.GC29351@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:41:10AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote: > > > > This patch introduces a derating factor to struct hwrng for > > the random bits going into the kernel input pool, and a common > > default derating for drivers which do not specify one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe > > > > --- > > drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 11 ++++++++++- > > include/linux/hw_random.h | 3 +++ > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > --- linux/include/linux/hw_random.h.orig > > +++ linux/include/linux/hw_random.h > > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ > > * @read: New API. drivers can fill up to max bytes of data > > * into the buffer. The buffer is aligned for any type. > > * @priv: Private data, for use by the RNG driver. > > + * @derating: Estimation of true entropy in RNG's bitstream > > + * (per mill). > > I'll bikeshed again: this is a rating, not a *de*rating. Higher = > more confidence, at least assuming the comment is right. > You're right. Would anyone object to call it "quality", as in RX signal quality? In context of a random source that is pretty accurate, I'd say. Other opinions? Torsten -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/