Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:10:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:10:02 -0500 Received: from mailhost.cotse.com ([216.112.42.58]:1295 "EHLO mailhost.cotse.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:10:00 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:11:06 -0500 (EST) X-Abuse-To: abuse@cotse.com Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.46-mm1 with contest From: "Alan Willis" To: In-Reply-To: <3DD01B32.4A113A71@digeo.com> References: <3DCC2ABE.5DDE9882@digeo.com> <3DD01B32.4A113A71@digeo.com> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: , , Reply-To: alan@cotse.com X-Mailer: www.cotse.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1102 Lines: 39 > That's an awful lot of mapped memory. Have you been altering > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness? Has some application run berzerk > and used tons of memory? > > Slab: 7592 kB > Committed_AS: 423120 kB > PageTables: 1996 kB > ReverseMaps: 69425 > HugePages_Total: 15 > HugePages_Free: 15 > Hugepagesize: 4096 kB vm.swappiness was set to 0 > > You've lost 60 megabytes in hugepages! Bill's patch (which is in .47) > changes the initial number of hugetlb pages to zero, which is rather > kinder. > > So I don't _think_ there's a leak here. It could be that your > normal workload fits OK ito 256 megs, but thrashes when it is > squeezed into 196 megs. > > Suggest you do `echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages' and retest. Done, vm.nr_hugepages = 0 # from 15 I'll stick to 2.5.46 for a while yet I guess, to be sure. -alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/