Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753846AbaDOUBv (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:01:51 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:6691 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751123AbaDOUBt (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:01:49 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,866,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="521220279" Message-ID: <1397591989.2715.18.camel@ideak-mobl> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] REGRESSION 3.14 i915 warning & mouse cursor vanishing From: Imre Deak Reply-To: imre.deak@intel.com To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Steven Noonan , David Airlie , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 22:59:49 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20140415194303.GH1023@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <20140414164010.GA1019@falcon> <867g6ryd2e.fsf@hiro.keithp.com> <20140414185602.GA892@falcon> <20140415194303.GH1023@phenom.ffwll.local> Organization: Intel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 21:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:56:03AM -0700, Steven Noonan wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:35:05AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > > Steven Noonan writes: > > > > > > > Was using my machine normally, then my mouse cursor vanished. After switching > > > > to a VT and back to X11, my cursor came back. But I did notice a nasty trace in > > > > dmesg (below). > > > > > > I don't think the trace below is related to the cursor disappearing. > > > > Any idea what the trace is all about then? Seems it has something to do > > with runtime power management (maybe my aggressive kernel command-line > > options are triggering it). > > Please test without them. Currently runtime pm should be disabled still on > vlv (since it's incomplete in 3.14). If you've force-enabled that then you > get to keep all pieces ;-) > > In general don't set any i915 options if you're not a developer or someone > else who _really_ knows what's going on. Note that the lspci output and the [ 1795.275026] [drm:hsw_unclaimed_reg_clear] *ERROR* Unknown unclaimed register before writing to 70084 line suggests HSW and the specs for ThinkPad Yoga suggests the same. But I don't know how the vlv_* functions can possible end up in those traces then, perhaps just a coincidence, random data on stack? For HSW the rc6 kernel option shouldn't make a difference. --Imre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/