Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266081AbSKLBnz>; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:43:55 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266086AbSKLBny>; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:43:54 -0500
Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:30213
	"EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id <S266081AbSKLBnx>; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:43:53 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFC] devfs API
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20021112013244.GF1729@mythical.michonline.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0211101348350.24061-100000@steklov.math.psu.edu>
	 <20021112013244.GF1729@mythical.michonline.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) 
Date: 11 Nov 2002 20:50:39 -0500
Message-Id: <1037065841.20631.13282.camel@phantasy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 651
Lines: 20

On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 20:32, Ryan Anderson wrote:

> From an outsider point of view (and because nobody else responded),
> I think the big question here would be: Would you use it after this
> cleanup?
> 
> If you say yes, I'd say that's a good sign in its favor.

Good heuristic, except Al would not use devfs in either case :)

Personally, as far as I am concerned, they are sane changes.

	Robert Love


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/