Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:00:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:00:22 -0500 Received: from web20702.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.175]:28504 "HELO web20702.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:00:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20021112020710.44554.qmail@web20702.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 02:07:10 +0000 (GMT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?mark=20walters?= Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest To: Con Kolivas , Andrew Morton Cc: linux kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <1037065894.3dd05ea6f1d84@kolivas.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 963 Lines: 31 --- Con Kolivas wrote: > > I agree. Fortunately I don't think it's as bad a > tradeoff as these numbers make > out. The load accounting in contest (johntest?) is > still relatively bogus. Apart > from saying it's more or less loads I dont think the > scale of the numbers are > accurate. Is the number of loads the total number of loads done during the kernel compile or the number of loads per unit time during the kernel compile? I was guessing the former. (Andrew appeared to be guessing the latter?) Mark __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/