Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754640AbaDPRew (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:34:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40146 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751198AbaDPReu (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:34:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: Implement SO_PASSCGROUP to enable passing cgroup path From: Simo Sorce To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: David Miller , Vivek Goyal , Tejun Heo , Daniel Walsh , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , lpoetter@redhat.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kay@redhat.com, Network Development In-Reply-To: References: <20140416002010.GA5035@redhat.com> <20140416.085743.1614257692560892039.davem@davemloft.net> <1397664837.19767.410.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org> <1397667766.19767.440.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:34:45 -0400 Message-ID: <1397669685.19767.450.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 10:29 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Then please remove SO_PASSCGROUP. Can you stop demanding changes while demonstrating you haven't well understood the needs, let alone the consequences ? Take a day or 2, put your thoughts together and come back with a clear description of your concerns if you still have any, please. You clearly do not like this proposal, but you can't really articulate why, all I hear at this point are the scratches of nails on the glass wall you are trying to climb. Seriously, if there are reasonable objections we all want to hear them, but they need to be clear and circumstanced. Simo. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/