Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161071AbaDPVeu (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:34:50 -0400 Received: from mail-ve0-f182.google.com ([209.85.128.182]:49920 "EHLO mail-ve0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756816AbaDPVes (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:34:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140416205136.GZ12304@sirena.org.uk> References: <1397592876-5741-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <1397672724-9063-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <1397672724-9063-6-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <20140416205136.GZ12304@sirena.org.uk> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:34:47 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1DZMOCVJWDDJHFU6MblkWKo0GeQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries From: Doug Anderson To: Mark Brown Cc: Anton Vorontsov , Olof Johansson , Sachin Kamat , AJAY KUMAR RAMAKRISHNA SHYMALAMMA , linux-samsung-soc , Simon Glass , Michael Spang , Sean Paul , Liam Girdwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark, On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:25:24AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: >> An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs >> wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report >> overcurrent). The most problematic FET was the one used for the LCD > > Please don't send new patches as replies in the middle of threads, it > makes it confusing trying to work out which versions of things should be > applied. I'm a little confused about what I did wrong. Can you give more details? * V1 had 3 patches plus a cover letter. * I was asked to split two patches, so V2 has 5 patches plus a cover letter. * My v2 series was all "in reply to" the v1 cover letter, which I thought was best practice. * All of my v2 patches were marked with v2 and included changes between v1 and v2. * Everyone was CCed on the cover letter. Only appropriate people were CCed on the individual patches (as per get_maintainer, automated by patman). * All patches were resent at v2. If I had to answer your question, I'd say that you should now completely ignore v1 and look at v2. -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/