Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 04:37:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 04:37:01 -0500 Received: from AGrenoble-101-1-1-247.abo.wanadoo.fr ([193.251.23.247]:2029 "EHLO awak") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 04:36:54 -0500 Subject: Re: devfs From: Xavier Bestel To: Ian Molton Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20021112093259.3d770f6e.spyro@f2s.com> References: <20021112093259.3d770f6e.spyro@f2s.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 12 Nov 2002 10:43:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1037094221.16831.21.camel@bip> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1136 Lines: 30 Le mar 12/11/2002 ? 10:32, Ian Molton a ?crit : > On 11 Nov 2002 20:50:39 -0500 > Robert Love wrote: > > > On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 20:32, Ryan Anderson wrote: > > > > > From an outsider point of view (and because nobody else responded), > > > I think the big question here would be: Would you use it after this > > > cleanup? > > > > > > If you say yes, I'd say that's a good sign in its favor. > > > > Good heuristic, except Al would not use devfs in either case :) > > Personally I love devfs. I've not looked at its internals, but its never > failed me yet, and I like the way /dev only contains stuff that actually > exists. I'm wondering if a totally userspace solution could replace devs ? Something using hotplug + sysfs and creating directories/nodes as they appear on the system. This way, the policy (how do I name what) could be moved out of the kernel. Xav - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/