Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 04:57:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 04:57:53 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:32965 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 04:57:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 05:04:41 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Xavier Bestel cc: Ian Molton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: devfs In-Reply-To: <1037094221.16831.21.camel@bip> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1082 Lines: 27 On 12 Nov 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote: > I'm wondering if a totally userspace solution could replace devs ? > Something using hotplug + sysfs and creating directories/nodes as they > appear on the system. This way, the policy (how do I name what) could be > moved out of the kernel. Guys, may I remind you that Oct 31 had been more than a week ago? Devfs *is* a race-ridden pile of crap, but we are in a goddamn feature freeze, so let's get real. Interfaces can and should be cleaned up. Ditto for semantics of registering/unregistering - that allows to make glue in drivers more straightforward. Majestic flamewars about removing the thing completely/ moving it to userland/etc. are exercises in masturbation by that point. Again, WE ARE IN FEATURE FREEZE. Now, does somebody have technical comments on the proposed changes? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/