Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 06:01:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 06:01:54 -0500 Received: from server0027.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.36]:56223 "EHLO server0027.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 06:01:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:08:34 +0000 From: Ian Molton To: Dave Jones Cc: viro@math.psu.edu, xavier.bestel@free.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: devfs Message-Id: <20021112110834.01e8f2da.spyro@f2s.com> In-Reply-To: <20021112104650.GA322@suse.de> References: <1037094221.16831.21.camel@bip> <20021112102535.1f94f50d.spyro@f2s.com> <20021112104650.GA322@suse.de> Organization: The Dragon Roost X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 920 Lines: 22 On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:46:50 +0000 Dave Jones wrote: > > And since when did feature freeze affect, as the guy said, *purely* > > userspace implementations? > > Since it would a *feature* to move it out of kernel space. > To reiterate : _FEATURE_ _FREEZE_. Nothing[1] new[2] > should be going into mainline at this point. nothing new WOULD be going in. nor would devfs need to move out - just disable it. It *is* still an option, is it not? > We should now be in the stabilising period, where we don't require > testers to have to upgrade their userspace every fortnight. its not a kernel issue anymore, if its totally in userspace, is it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/