Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:57:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:57:12 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:13478 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:57:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] IDE: correct partially initialised hw structures From: Alan Cox To: Peter Denison Cc: Andre Hedrick , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 12 Nov 2002 14:28:59 +0000 Message-Id: <1037111339.8313.14.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 952 Lines: 25 On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 19:04, Peter Denison wrote: > Actually, if the patch that moves ide_init_default_hwifs() is applied then > maybe this isn't strictly necessary. The whole area needs cleaning up, but > I was loathe to start doing major changes. I've done large parts of the > call tree for the ide driver, and I _still_ don't fully understand what > should be called when. Just as a sample, there's: > ide_init_data > ide_init_default_hwifs > ide_init_hwif_ports > init_hwif_data > ideprobe_init > probe_hwif_init > hwif_init > etc. Can you leave that bit alone for the moment. I'm currently splitting ide.c into ide.c and ide-io.c so that all the crap is in one place ready for extermination - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/