Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:13:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:13:48 -0500 Received: from keetweej.xs4all.nl ([213.84.46.114]:1408 "EHLO muur.intranet.vanheusden.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:13:47 -0500 Message-ID: <1094.80.127.241.140.1037110826.squirrel@keetweej.vanheusden.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:20:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN From: "Folkert van Heusden" To: In-Reply-To: <1037111029.8321.12.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <20021111.151929.31543489.davem@redhat.com> <52r8drn0jk.fsf_-_@topspin.com> <20021111.153845.69968013.davem@redhat.com> <1037060322.2887.76.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <52isz3mza0.fsf@topspin.com> <1037111029.8321.12.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: , , Reply-To: folkert@vanheusden.com X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 486 Lines: 16 Hi, Am I right that in net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c in function "tcp_v4_get_port" the portnumber for a new connection is generated? Because fiddling with that code seems to have no effect on the portnumbers generated for new connections. Folkert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/