Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:38:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:38:54 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:48399 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:38:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 07:40:33 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Xavier Bestel Cc: Ian Molton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: devfs Message-ID: <20021112154032.GA30343@kroah.com> References: <20021112093259.3d770f6e.spyro@f2s.com> <1037094221.16831.21.camel@bip> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1037094221.16831.21.camel@bip> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 989 Lines: 25 On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:43:41AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > I'm wondering if a totally userspace solution could replace devs ? > Something using hotplug + sysfs and creating directories/nodes as they > appear on the system. This way, the policy (how do I name what) could be > moved out of the kernel. Yes, that is _exactly_ what I am working on doing, and have stated as such on this list a number of times in the past. As for it being after the feature freeze comment, like Alan noted, everything is already present to do this, it's just going to take some more notifiers being added and some userspace code written. And no, even if all of this gets done, I would not want to remove devfs from the kernel, yet :) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/