Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 05:21:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 05:21:10 -0500 Received: from rrzd1.rz.uni-regensburg.de ([132.199.1.6]:5389 "EHLO rrzd1.rz.uni-regensburg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 05:21:00 -0500 From: "Ulrich Windl" Organization: Universitaet Regensburg, Klinikum To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:20:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: 2.4.x: spinlock problem Message-ID: <3A7FDE02.17474.A94DE@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I had reported this before: In 2.4.0 getting exact system time from interrupt handlers seems inaccurate (in 2.2.18 it works fine). I have applied the same modifications to the 2.4 code base as to 2.2. With 2.4.1 the kernel is incredibly slow, so you can watch the individual lines of kernel boot be printed on the screen. I checked the spinlocks, but could not find a problem. Before I start removing the new spinlocks for timer, PIC and RTC, I'd like to hear what the gurus might think. I also tried to find out how I can profile the kernel or trace the spinlocks, but that seems to be hardly documented. Any hints? Regards, Ulrich - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/