Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:17:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:17:35 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:10720 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:17:33 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: Anders Gustafsson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lord@sgi.com Subject: Re: 2.5-bk AT_GID clash In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2002 02:18:58 BST." <20021112011858.GB19877@gagarin> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 04:16:56 +1100 Message-Id: <20021112172423.91C0C2C2DA@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1187 Lines: 31 In message <20021112011858.GB19877@gagarin> you write: > Hi, > > the new module-api making module.h including elf.h have exposed a name clash > in xfs: > > include/linux/elf.h:175:#define AT_GID 13 /* real gid */ > fs/xfs/linux/xfs_vnode.h:547:#define AT_GID 0x00000008 > > Can one be renamed? Probably should be. I don't use AT_GID from memory, maybe somewhere else in the kernel is. > Maybe module.h shouldn't be including elf.h, that afaik is needed by the > arch-specific module loaders and not by all modules. A split into > module.h for the modules and moduleloader.h for the arch-spec-loaders? This might be OK too, but in practice I don't think much will be in moduleloader.h: asm/module.h only really defines struct mod_arch_specific, which is embedded in struct module, and struct module needs to be exposed for those inlines... Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/