Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753621AbaDRJmU (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2014 05:42:20 -0400 Received: from ip4-83-240-18-248.cust.nbox.cz ([83.240.18.248]:45945 "EHLO ip4-83-240-18-248.cust.nbox.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752222AbaDRJWs (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2014 05:22:48 -0400 From: Jiri Slaby To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Rainer Weikusat , "David S. Miller" , Jiri Slaby Subject: [PATCH 3.12 33/72] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:22:06 +0200 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.2 In-Reply-To: <3389f243c528afc7c7300c83b8f296290cd3656d.1397812482.git.jslaby@suse.cz> References: <3389f243c528afc7c7300c83b8f296290cd3656d.1397812482.git.jslaby@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Dumazet 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. =============== [ Upstream commit de1443916791d75fdd26becb116898277bb0273f ] Some applications didn't expect recvmsg() on a non blocking socket could return -EINTR. This possibility was added as a side effect of commit b3ca9b02b00704 ("net: fix multithreaded signal handling in unix recv routines"). To hit this bug, you need to be a bit unlucky, as the u->readlock mutex is usually held for very small periods. Fixes: b3ca9b02b00704 ("net: fix multithreaded signal handling in unix recv routines") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Cc: Rainer Weikusat Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby --- net/unix/af_unix.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index d7c1ac621a90..c3975bcf725f 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -1785,8 +1785,11 @@ static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, goto out; err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock); - if (err) { - err = sock_intr_errno(sock_rcvtimeo(sk, noblock)); + if (unlikely(err)) { + /* recvmsg() in non blocking mode is supposed to return -EAGAIN + * sk_rcvtimeo is not honored by mutex_lock_interruptible() + */ + err = noblock ? -EAGAIN : -ERESTARTSYS; goto out; } @@ -1911,6 +1914,7 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk); struct sockaddr_un *sunaddr = msg->msg_name; int copied = 0; + int noblock = flags & MSG_DONTWAIT; int check_creds = 0; int target; int err = 0; @@ -1926,7 +1930,7 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, goto out; target = sock_rcvlowat(sk, flags&MSG_WAITALL, size); - timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags&MSG_DONTWAIT); + timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, noblock); /* Lock the socket to prevent queue disordering * while sleeps in memcpy_tomsg @@ -1938,8 +1942,11 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, } err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock); - if (err) { - err = sock_intr_errno(timeo); + if (unlikely(err)) { + /* recvmsg() in non blocking mode is supposed to return -EAGAIN + * sk_rcvtimeo is not honored by mutex_lock_interruptible() + */ + err = noblock ? -EAGAIN : -ERESTARTSYS; goto out; } -- 1.9.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/