Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:52:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:52:34 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:13715 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:52:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3DD16BA5.DFE01C34@digeo.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:59:17 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.46 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Davidsen CC: Aaron Lehmann , Con Kolivas , linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest References: <3DD0E037.1FC50147@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Nov 2002 20:59:17.0570 (UTC) FILETIME=[5D55FA20:01C28A8E] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 846 Lines: 18 Bill Davidsen wrote: > > In the area of things I do do every day, the occasionally posted AIM and > BYTE benchmarks look as though pipe latency and thruput are down, UNIX > socket latency and thruput are down, and these are things which will make > the system feel slower. Yes, the AIM numbers which have been posted here are quite outrageous. It's (hopefully) either a few Great Big Bugs or something in 2.5 has invalidated the measurements. Or, conceivably, the reduction of the size of the slabs_free list in the slab allocator. I shall be taking a look at what's going on in there fairly soon. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/