Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:53:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:52:25 -0500 Received: from im2.mail.tds.net ([216.170.230.92]:24816 "EHLO im2.sec.tds.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:52:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:57:43 -0500 (EST) From: Jon Portnoy X-X-Sender: portnoy@cerberus.localhost To: "Theodore Ts'o" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] devfs API In-Reply-To: <20021112080417.GA11660@think.thunk.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1186 Lines: 33 On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:49:22PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: [snip] > > Hi Al, > > It's good that you're trying to clean up the devfs code, but... > > How many people are actually using devfs these days? I don't like it > myself, and I've had to add a fair amount of hair to fsck's > mount-by-label/uuid code to deal with interesting cases such as > kernels where devfs is configured, but not actually mounted (it > changes what /proc/partitions exports). So I'm one of those who have > never looked all that kindly on devfs, which shouldn't come as a > surprise to most folks. > > In any case, if there aren't all that many people using devfs, I can > think of a really easy way in which we could simplify and clean up its > API by slimming it down by 100%...... > Actually, a lot of people are. Gentoo, at least, uses it by default. I think devfs is a good idea, as a user of it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/