Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751521AbaDUFXX (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 01:23:23 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]:46624 "EHLO mail-qc0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751319AbaDUFXU (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 01:23:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201404191730.54400.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1397824031-4892-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <53518FAC.8020504@zytor.com> <201404191730.54400.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:23:19 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GRO46wp9UEIuKwNmE18K6tB8cS0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port From: Ley Foon Tan To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, cltang@codesourcery.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 18 April 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Did the generic headers ever get updated to match Linus' guidance that >> any new architecture ports should use a 64-bit time_t? > > No, unfortunately not. With my rule that every architecture that gets > added needs to clean up asm-generic some more, to make it easier to add > the next one, we should probably do for nios2. > > Arnd Can you give me the documentation on this new guidance and point me any architecture have implemented this? Thanks. Ley Foon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/