Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751693AbaDUIOO (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 04:14:14 -0400 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]:56078 "EHLO relay1.mentorg.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751028AbaDUIOJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 04:14:09 -0400 Message-ID: <5354D34B.4030607@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:14:03 +0800 From: Chung-Lin Tang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" , Ley Foon Tan , Arnd Bergmann CC: , , , Chung-Lin Tang Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port References: <1397824031-4892-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <53518FAC.8020504@zytor.com> <201404191730.54400.arnd@arndb.de> <5354AD36.5090809@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <5354AD36.5090809@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Apr 2014 08:14:07.0180 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA7BE8C0:01CF5D39] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/4/21 1:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/20/2014 10:23 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Friday 18 April 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>>> Did the generic headers ever get updated to match Linus' guidance that >>>> any new architecture ports should use a 64-bit time_t? >>> >>> No, unfortunately not. With my rule that every architecture that gets >>> added needs to clean up asm-generic some more, to make it easier to add >>> the next one, we should probably do for nios2. >>> >>> Arnd >> >> Can you give me the documentation on this new guidance and point me >> any architecture have implemented this? >> Thanks. >> > > We implemented it in the x32 ABI for x86. In generic code this is keyed > by COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME, but in your case it isn't actually a matter of > compat, so it should be easier. > > See this thread including the discussion about time_t: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/26/415 > > -hpa I'm not sure why we need CONFIG_USE_64BIT_TIME? We don't have any 32-on-64 problems. My understanding of what Arnd meant, was to clean up asm-generic/posix_types.h such that for example, time_t should be defined as a 'long long' type, which should be 64-bit almost everywhere. At least AFAIK, that should work for all current asm-generic users. Thanks, Chung-Lin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/