Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267038AbSKMADA>; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:03:00 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267039AbSKMADA>; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:03:00 -0500
Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:39696 "HELO
	kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S267038AbSKMAC7>;
	Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:02:59 -0500
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:04:35 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
       "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
       Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       hohnbaum@us.ibm.com, mochel@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [0/4] NUMA-Q: remove PCI bus number mangling
Message-ID: <20021113000435.GE32274@kroah.com>
References: <E18BaIc-0006Zs-00@holomorphy> <20021112205241.GS23425@holomorphy.com> <3DD172B8.8040802@us.ibm.com> <20021112213504.GV23425@holomorphy.com> <20021112213906.GW23425@holomorphy.com> <177250000.1037141189@flay> <20021112215305.GZ23425@holomorphy.com> <179150000.1037145229@flay> <20021112225937.GA23425@holomorphy.com> <20021112235824.GG22031@holomorphy.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021112235824.GG22031@holomorphy.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1225
Lines: 31

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 03:58:24PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 03:53:49PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >> Right, I'm not against the sysdata thing, seems like a much better way
> >> to do it in general (what I did was a quick hack). Was just confused
> >> by the global bus number assertion, but if we use the sysdata stuff,
> >> it's all a non-issue ;-)
> > 
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > Non-issue for merging...
> > The pain isn't over yet. =(
> > Core PCI code is assuming unique bus numbers in several places.
> 
> Okay, an attempt to remedy this world-breaking braindamage with the
> fewest lines of code:
> 
> This alters PCI bus number "clash" detection to compare ->sysdata in
> addition to the numbers. The bus number is not a unique identifier.

Um, why not?

And what would /sys/bus/pci/devices look like if you allow the same
identifiers for different devices?  :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/