Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753913AbaDUSJY (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:09:24 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:47391 "EHLO mail-la0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753558AbaDUSJU (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:09:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140421155055.GU4496@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <53546158.3020906@gmail.com> <20140421155055.GU4496@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Pranith Kumar Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:08:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: cleanup: make rcutorture specific definitions depend on config value To: Paul McKenney Cc: LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Good observation, but this approach prevents someone from building an > rcutorture module after the fact for a kernel that was built with > CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=n. So I have to say "no" on this one. > OK, I did not consider that case! I will keep my eyes open while studying the code. Regards, -- Pranith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/