Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:19:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:19:16 -0500 Received: from linuxcare.com.au ([203.29.91.49]:44812 "EHLO front.linuxcare.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:18:59 -0500 From: Anton Blanchard Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 01:17:25 +1100 To: lists@frednet.dyndns.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hot swap CPU support for 2.4.1@ Message-ID: <20010207011725.B15995@linuxcare.com> In-Reply-To: <20010205151917.A17110@frednet.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <20010205151917.A17110@frednet.dyndns.org>; from lists@frednet.dyndns.org on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 03:19:17PM -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Would any special hardware besides a multi-cpu system be necessarey to > test this out? You should be able to run it on any SMP machine assuming you write the arch specific code (PPC could be used as an example). Of course it isn't very interesting if the hardware doesn't support hot swap :) As soon as I get the SMP ultra booting again (I arrived one morning to hear the disk was making loud grinding noises) I'll code up sparc (ie E10K) support. It sounds like S390 support will be trivial, I'd love to get my hands on one of those :) Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/