Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755074AbaDVIVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:21:50 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com ([74.125.82.170]:48763 "EHLO mail-we0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752796AbaDVIVq (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:21:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:21:39 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Matt Porter Cc: Mark Brown , Devicetree List , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , Tim Kryger , Markus Mayer , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM Kernel List Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: bcm590xx: add support for second i2c slave address space Message-ID: <20140422082139.GF17657@lee--X1> References: <1397501428-8857-1-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org> <1397501428-8857-3-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org> <20140416110603.GA19671@lee--X1> <20140416213141.GD12304@sirena.org.uk> <20140417065753.GC28725@lee--X1> <20140417222616.GK23695@beef> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20140417222616.GK23695@beef> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > s/regmap/Regmap > > > > > > It's consistently written regmap in all the documentation and so on :) > > > > Furry muff; but the comments still stand for the acronyms. > > > > > > addmap{0,1} doesn't quite sit right with me. > > > > > > > REVISIT: Ah, it's address-map, rather than add map. Okay, not as bad > > > > as I first thought, but still, is there a better naming convention you > > > > could use? > > > > > > addrmap or something? > > > > Right, that was what I was thinking. However, I prefer something along > > the lines of 'i2c' and 'i2c_sec' or 'client' and 'client_slv' etc. > > FWIW, the reason it's addmap{0,1} is that the datasheet has documents > ADDMAP=0 and the first bank of registers and ADDMAP=1 as the second bank > of registers. I adopted that to match the docs for the part. > > I guess we could do i2c and i2c_sec, I'll just have to put a comment > correlating it to the h/w. Calling it 'slv' implies something else > so we should avoid that here. The notion of a "secondary" i2c device > is completely a Linux I2C subsystem fabrication which wouldn't exist > if it allowed multiple slave addresses per device. From a h/w > perspective there is really no primary and secondary relationship. > > I'm fine with i2c/i2c_sec or addrmap0/1 and I will just comment to > correlate with the datasheet..pick one. Let's stick method fabricated by the I2C subsystem. It may seem strange from a h/w perspective, but it is the way we (you) have coded it, as the first parameter of i2c_new_dummy() is the 'managing' (primary, parent, master, whatever) device, so '_sec' would suit as an identifying appendage for the resultant device. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/