Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932318AbaDVLgb (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:36:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176]:45401 "EHLO mail-ob0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755829AbaDVLgZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:36:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1396981215-24888-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> References: <1396981215-24888-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:36:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] add gpio_chip_ops to hold GPIO operations From: Linus Walleij To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Mika Westerberg , Andy Shevchenko , Arnd Bergmann , Santosh Shilimkar , Kevin Hilman , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-OMAP , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > So this is an RFC patch-set to add a virtual table to be used by > GPIO chip controllers and consist of the following patches: Overall I like this. However I don't want to see any transitional phase. I prefer a BIG fat patch converting everyone and its dog to the new vtable and removing the old function pointers. This can be based on the HEAD of my GPIO devel branch. It may be a good idea to use coccinelle for this refactoring in order not to miss any users. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/