Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:50:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:50:50 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:50705 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:50:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:52:23 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Miles Bader Cc: "J.E.J. Bottomley" , Matthew Wilcox , "Adam J. Richter" , andmike@us.ibm.com, hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mochel@osdl.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Untested port of parisc_device to generic device interface Message-ID: <20021113075223.GZ2106@kroah.com> References: <20021109060342.GA7798@kroah.com> <200211091533.gA9FXuW02017@localhost.localdomain> <20021113061310.GD2106@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 931 Lines: 23 On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:46:58PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Greg KH writes: > > What is the real reason for needing this, pci_alloc_consistent()? We > > have talked about renaming that to dev_alloc_consistent() in the past, > > which I think will work for you, right? > > This this would end up [or have the ability to] invoking a bus-specific > routine at some point, right? [so that a truly PCI-specific definition > could be still be had] If that was needed, yes, we should not break that functionality. Are there any existing archs that need more than just dma_mask moved to struct device out of pci_dev? Hm, ppc might need a bit more... thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/