Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753437AbaDVSsY (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:48:24 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]:62414 "EHLO mail-lb0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753164AbaDVSsX (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:48:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201404221855.57247.marex@denx.de> References: <1398175396-7560-1-git-send-email-grmoore@altera.com> <1398175396-7560-2-git-send-email-grmoore@altera.com> <201404221855.57247.marex@denx.de> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:48:21 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] Add support for flag status register on Micron chips. From: Graham Moore To: Marek Vasut Cc: Graham Moore , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Artem Bityutskiy , Sourav Poddar , Sascha Hauer , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jingoo Han , Insop Song , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Tull , Dinh Nguyen , Yves Vandervennet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Are you sure the n25q512a doesn't use FSR ? Do n25q512a{1,8}3 share the same > IDs? I looked at the datasheet and the n25q512a *does* have the same FSR usage note, so I suppose I should add USE_FSR to it as well. But how is it working now? Maybe nobody is actually using that chip. Yes, n25q512a{1,8}3 share the same id, 0x20ba20. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/