Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756504AbaDWOed (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:34:33 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com ([209.85.192.43]:63582 "EHLO mail-qg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752352AbaDWOea (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:34:30 -0400 X-Google-Original-From: Vince Weaver Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:37:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Vince Weaver To: Vince Weaver cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [perf] yet another 32/64-bit range check failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20140423102254.GL11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Vince Weaver wrote: > > I suppose I should make a patch for attr->sample_type and > attr->read_format which after a quick audit seem to exhibit the same > problem? nevermind, PERF_FORMAT_MAX and PERF_SAMPLE_MAX are enum values, not #defines, so they handle being 64-bit properly. Vince -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/