Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751937AbaDXGEm (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:04:42 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52]:45246 "EHLO mail-qa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751311AbaDXGEk (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:04:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201404231423.51221.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1397824031-4892-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <201404231423.51221.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:04:39 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DCPaiMSTvr0ChYTVk2zqr44zKxE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/28] nios2: Exception handling From: Ley Foon Tan To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , cltang@codesourcery.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> We really shouldn't be doing new architecture specific procfs files >> >> any more. I suggest you drop this one for now, and add back the >> >> functionality using perf or ftrace at a later point. >> > >> > Okay, will remove this. >> >> MIPS and powerpc handle this through debugfs, cfr. >> arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c and arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c. > > Ah, right, that would work too. Being able to use perf from user > space sounds more flexible though. It's certainly something that > can be decided later. Yes, we can add this back through debugfs or perf in later. Regards Ley Foon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/