Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:35:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:35:38 -0500 Received: from 1-064.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.181.137.64]:39589 "EHLO 1-064.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:35:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:42:11 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Benjamin LaHaise cc: Andrew Morton , , Subject: Re: [patch] remove hugetlb syscalls In-Reply-To: <20021113184555.B10889@redhat.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 880 Lines: 25 On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > Since the functionality of the hugetlb syscalls is now available via > hugetlbfs with better control over permissions, could you apply the > following patch that gets rid of a lot of duplicate and unnescessary > code by removing the two hugetlb syscalls? #include Yes, lets get rid of this ugliness before somebody actually finds a way to use these syscalls... regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/