Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 08:00:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:59:57 -0500 Received: from ha1.rdc2.mi.home.com ([24.2.68.68]:7150 "EHLO mail.rdc2.mi.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:59:38 -0500 Message-ID: <39FEC1FE.A6AB5C2A@didntduck.org> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:58:38 -0500 From: Brian Gerst X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kmalloc() allocation. In-Reply-To: <8tll94$hc9$1@cesium.transmeta.com> <39FE6291.FA8162A7@didntduck.org> <20001031094445.A24901@gruyere.muc.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 01:11:29AM -0500, Brian Gerst wrote: > > This was just changed in 2.4 so that vmalloced pages are faulted in on > > demand. > > Could you explain how it handles the vmalloc() -- vfree() -- vmalloc() of same > virtual space but different physical race ? As far as I can tell (I didn't write the code), vfree didn't change. It's only vmalloc that's lazy now. -- Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/