Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752638AbaDYWjl (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:39:41 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:52213 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752545AbaDYWjK (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:39:10 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Dmitry Kasatkin Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Dmitry Kasatkin , linux-security-module , John Johansen , Mimi Zohar , James Morris , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Linux Kernel Mailing List , kernel-team References: <535A5C78.1070901@samsung.com> <535A75C1.3050901@samsung.com> <20140425182310.GA9128@redhat.com> <87sip15iy5.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20140425192543.GA11908@redhat.com> <878uqt42q7.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20140425200156.GA13727@redhat.com> <874n1h16le.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87iopxxfpp.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:38:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Kasatkin's message of "Sat, 26 Apr 2014 00:56:32 +0300") Message-ID: <87lhutt4ph.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19BiM8l1KqMpBElRzCNrz//uVU5/zWthn4= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 98.234.51.111 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% * [score: 0.3131] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Dmitry Kasatkin X-Spam-Relay-Country: Subject: Re: Kernel panic at Ubuntu: IMA + Apparmor X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:58:17 -0700) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dmitry Kasatkin writes: > Is it really a show stopper to switch order of 2 functions as quick fix? > It was like that before 3.10 and seemed ok... When that is the question. The answer is yes it is a show stopper. A quick fix to bury a fundamental design flaw because the code previously seemed ok. That seems fundamentally wrong. Having IMA conflict with Apparmor in Kconfig would be a sensible quick fix. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/