Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751794AbaDYXwQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:52:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19394 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751334AbaDYXwO (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:52:14 -0400 Message-ID: <535AF527.80601@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 00:52:07 +0100 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ley Foon Tan CC: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, lftan.linux@gmail.com, cltang@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/28] nios2: ptrace support References: <1397824031-4892-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <1397824031-4892-22-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> In-Reply-To: <1397824031-4892-22-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Does this support PTRACE_GETREGSET / PTRACE_SETREGSET ? IMO, the kernel shouldn't accept ports without those anymore. And IMHO, we shouldn't even allow new ports having PTRACE_GETREGS. http://sourceware.org/ml/archer/2010-q3/msg00193.html -- Pedro Alves -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/