Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:42:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:42:19 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:46764 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:42:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] remove hugetlb syscalls From: Alan Cox To: Jeff Garzik Cc: David.Mosberger@acm.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: <3DD3F960.6000501@pobox.com> References: <08a601c28bb b$2f6182a0$760010ac@edumazet> <20021114141310.A25747@infradead.org> <1037298675.16000.47.camel@irongate.swansea.linux .org.uk> <15827.61722.800066.756875@panda.mostang.com> <3DD3F960.6000501@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 14 Nov 2002 20:15:06 +0000 Message-Id: <1037304906.16000.65.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 642 Lines: 13 On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 19:28, Jeff Garzik wrote: > However, that said, I think hugetlbfs will almost always get used in > preference to the syscalls, so leaving them in may be more a statement > of technical correctness/cleanliness than anything else. Just rewrite the syscall crap in userspace as library functions calling hugetlbfs. End of problem, less kernel code, less bugs, same interface - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/