Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:23:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:23:44 -0500 Received: from modemcable017.51-203-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.203.51.17]:37150 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:23:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:24:11 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Rusty Russell cc: Linux Kernel , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5] Remove BUG in cpu_up In-Reply-To: <20021114040920.CF9B82C0F7@lists.samba.org> Message-ID: X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.19-pre5-ac3-zm4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 698 Lines: 23 On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Rusty Russell wrote: > What's wrong with doing it sync? Are you in a hurry? 8) > > That's what the return code is *for*... > Rusty. Yes, i'd rather a box limp along until i can come up with a solution rather than it sit there indefinitely waiting for a processor which has decided to go on early retirement ;) But i feel like i'm going round in circles, anyone else with opinions on this? Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/