Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753997AbaD2E6G (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:58:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:50157 "EHLO mail-ob0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751263AbaD2E6E (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:58:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <535D80C8.9090906@semaphore.gr> References: <535D80C8.9090906@semaphore.gr> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:28:02 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change the calculation of next pstate From: Viresh Kumar To: Stratos Karafotis , Dirk Brandewie Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc'd Dirk, On 28 April 2014 03:42, Stratos Karafotis wrote: > Currently the driver calculates the next pstate proportional to > core_busy factor and reverse proportional to current pstate. > > Change the above method and calculate the next pstate independently > of current pstate. We must mention why the change is required. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/