Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:40:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:40:23 -0500 Received: from modemcable017.51-203-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.203.51.17]:40458 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:40:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:40:04 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Corey Minyard cc: Linus Torvalds , "Heater, Daniel (IndSys, GEFanuc, VMIC)" , John Levon , Dipankar Sarma , Subject: Re: NMI handling rework for x86 In-Reply-To: <3DD47858.3060404@mvista.com> Message-ID: X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.19-pre5-ac3-zm4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 958 Lines: 23 On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Corey Minyard wrote: > John Levon suggested I send this to you. It's a cleanup of the NMI > handling to make it into a request/release mechanism (instead of > hard-coding everything into traps.c). It renames "nmi.c" to > "nmi_watchdog.c" (as it should be named) and moves the real NMI handling > code from traps.c to nmi.c. It's been posted and reworked on lkml, and > it seems to have finally met approval. The "cc-ed" people have reviewed > the patch (or at least made helpful suggestions :-). What interrupt rate have you tested this at? SMP? Adding handlers at runtime? I'm still skeptical on how RCU protects you, but i'm RCU clueless... Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/