Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754101AbaD2Wx4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:53:56 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35691 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750813AbaD2Wxz (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:53:55 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:53:53 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, sandeen@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, mhocko@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com, mpatlasov@parallels.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom Message-Id: <20140429155353.8fe070101d3b4faa0c825d99@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <53602C2B.50604@redhat.com> References: <20140429151910.53f740ef@annuminas.surriel.com> <20140429153936.49a2710c0c2bba4d233032f2@linux-foundation.org> <53602C2B.50604@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:48:11 -0400 Rik van Riel wrote: > On 04/29/2014 06:39 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:19:10 -0400 Rik van Riel wrote: > > > >> It is possible for "limit - setpoint + 1" to equal zero, leading to a > >> divide by zero error. Blindly adding 1 to "limit - setpoint" is not > >> working, so we need to actually test the divisor before calling div64. > >> > >> ... > >> > >> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c > >> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c > >> @@ -597,11 +597,16 @@ static inline long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint, > >> unsigned long dirty, > >> unsigned long limit) > >> { > >> + unsigned int divisor; > > > > I'm thinking this would be better as a ulong so I don't have to worry > > my pretty head over truncation things? > > I looked at div_*64, and the second argument is a 32 bit > variable. I guess a long would be ok, since if we are > dividing by more than 4 billion we don't really care :) > > static inline s64 div_s64(s64 dividend, s32 divisor) ah, good point. Switching to ulong is perhaps a bit misleading then. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/