Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934105AbaD3QcW (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:32:22 -0400 Received: from g4t3425.houston.hp.com ([15.201.208.53]:46293 "EHLO g4t3425.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934073AbaD3QcV (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:32:21 -0400 Message-ID: <1398875537.2618.9.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rwsem: Support optimistic spinning From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Tim Chen , Andrea Arcangeli , Alex Shi , Andi Kleen , Michel Lespinasse , Rik van Riel , Peter Hurley , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E.McKenney" , Aswin Chandramouleeswaran , "Norton, Scott J" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:32:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140430092136.GD11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1398205166.6345.7.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1398722941.25549.16.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140430092136.GD11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4 (3.6.4-3.fc18) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 11:21 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:09:01PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > > > +#else > > +static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem) > > +{ > > + return false; > > +} > > +#endif > > On the mutex side we guard this with MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER, do we want to > use that here too? I thought of it, but hated adding mutex naming to rwsem code -- we already do it for cpu_relax() thanks to s390. MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER depends on SMP && !DEBUG_MUTEXES. Right now rwsem optimistic spinning depends on SMP && RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM. It might sense to add RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER to encapsulate what we already have. I don't think we want DEBUG_MUTEX dependencies in rwsems. Would you accept such thing? Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/