Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934042AbaD3Q4b (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:56:31 -0400 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:43698 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752084AbaD3Q4a convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:56:30 -0400 From: James Bottomley To: "ching2048@areca.com.tw" CC: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "dan.carpenter@oracle.com" , "thenzl@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.0 1/11] arcmsr: Revise interrupt service routine relate function Thread-Topic: [PATCH v1.0 1/11] arcmsr: Revise interrupt service routine relate function Thread-Index: AQHPZFhOvfvftTBc/k2wbyNFUk9Bj5sq1s0A Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:56:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1398876964.2182.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> References: <1398850855.1769.11.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1398850855.1769.11.camel@localhost> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [98.237.244.146] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-ID: <7857E40DF4806C4CB357F2CA470CF033@sw.swsoft.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 17:40 +0800, ching wrote: > From: Ching > > Rewrite interrupt service routine relate function to fix command > timeout on controller very heavy loading. OK, so I think you've confused us a bit. This looks to be an update of your previous v1.4 patch set, yet it's now called v1.0? Could you please include a cover letter as patch 0/x like you see everyone else doing on the list? In this cover letter can you tell us what the disposition of the previous feedback is and what other changes have you done? You didn't reply to any of the comments, have have you fixed them? It's very dispiriting to review 11 patches, give feedback and not hear anything ... and then have to review an even longer set of patches just to see if anything was done about your previous comments. The less interactive you are with reviews, the less chance there is that people will review updates ... without external reviewers, you go on a very long backlog of things I have to review before the patches get in. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/